This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.

Q&A With Lockheed Martin on Combat System Integration for Australia's Future Submarines

a
Focus - SEA1000 Combat System Integrator - Lockheed Martin
 
 
 
Q&A With Lockheed Martin on Combat System Integration for Australia's Future Submarines
 
While the Australian Government selected DCNS and its Shortfin Barracuda block 1A for the SEA1000 future submarine platform last month, a competition is still ongoing for the Combat System Integrator (CSI). Navy Recognition contacted Lockheed Martin and Raytheon to learn more about the strength of the two competitors. These are the answers from Lockheed Martin.
     
While the Australian Government selected DCNS and its Shortfin Barracuda block 1A for the SEA1000 future submarine platform last month, a competition is still ongoing for the Combat System Integrator (CSI). Navy Recognition contacted Lockheed Martin and Raytheon to learn more about the strength of the two competitors. These are the answers from Lockheed Martin.
Shortfin Barracuda Block 1A. Image: DCNS
     
Xavier Vavasseur, Navy Recognition chief editor (NR): Should your system be selected, it will be your first time working on integration with a French shipbuilder. Do you see this as a challenge?
Mike Oliver, business development director for Lockheed Martin SEA 1000 combat systems integrator (LM): We view this as an exciting challenge for which we are uniquely capable based on our history of working with numerous shipyards worldwide. In addition to being the combat system integrator across all classes of U.S. submarines, we have extensive experience working with the Spanish, Brazilian, Dutch and Canadian Navies and shipbuilders. We see this broad experience, working with multiple international shipbuilders across all phases of submarine design and build activities, as uniquely positioning us to work successfully with DCNS. So we are eager to work together on the SEA1000 program and believe our combined talents and efforts will make SEA1000 a very successful shipbuilding program.

NR: Have you discussed or worked with DCNS on the Shortfin Barracuda already?

LM: Yes, for the past 12 months we have had numerous mutually beneficial engagements with DCNS both in France and in Australia. We are able to bring to bear the Lockheed Martin processes from the Virginia class submarine program, one of the most successful programs in U.S. Department of Defense history, where Lockheed Martin is already operating in a co-contractor arrangement with the shipbuilder. We have been very encouraged by our interactions to date and believe our business cultures are well aligned and conducive to forming an effective and collaborative working relationship.
     
While the Australian Government selected DCNS and its Shortfin Barracuda block 1A for the SEA1000 future submarine platform last month, a competition is still ongoing for the Combat System Integrator (CSI). Navy Recognition contacted Lockheed Martin and Raytheon to learn more about the strength of the two competitors. These are the answers from Lockheed Martin.
Lockheed Martin is operating in a co-contractor arrangement with HII for the Virginia-class submarine program. USS John Warner (SSN 785) pictured here was delivered on June 19, 2015, two and a half months ahead of schedule. Photo by Chris Oxley/HII
     
NR: Will your engineers work in France at a DCNS site at some point of the program?
LM: For work of this complexity we think it is essential that the combat system integrator work closely with DCNS. On other new submarine construction efforts we have placed our combat system engineers in close proximity to the platform builder during the design phase and anticipate doing so for this project.

NR: Is your combat system based on an existing/in service one? What makes it unique, what is its main advantage in your opinion?
LM: When we have done this in the past we have worked closely with the ship designer to select combat systems and subsystems that will integrate into the submarine without adding undo cost or risk that also delivers superior performance. We know that combat system requirements will evolve over the next few years and there will be many hardware and software developments between now and delivery of the first submarine. What is important at this point is to bring to bear the processes and deep submarine system knowledge or “know how and know why”, as DCNS’s CEO Herve Guillou has called it, for the purpose of conducting the concept design and establishing the basic combat system architecture. So what makes our approach unique is that we are the only combat system provider that has the “know how and know why” to do this work through all stages of design, production and sustainment, and deliver a submarine with superior capability.

The same quesions were asked to Raytheon. Follow this link for Raytheon's answers.

The Australian Government has selected DCNS as its preferred international partner for the design of 12 Future submarines for the Royal Australian Navy. The announcement was made on April 26 2016 by the Australian Prime Minister the Hon. Malcolm Turnbull, the Minister for Defence, Senator the Hon. Marise Payne, The Minister for Industry, Innovation and Science, the Hon. Christopher Pyne and The Chief of Navy, Vice Admiral Tim Barrett. DCNS was competing with the Shortfin Barracuda design against TKMS' Type 216 and Japan's Soryu class designs. Based on the French Navy Barracuda SSN currently in final stage of construction, the Shortfin Barracuda is 3 meters shorter (94 meters) and 200 tons lighter (4,500 tons).